When I Knew

I don’t know how many times I’ve told my deconversion story, in whole or in part, on this blog or elsewhere, but my impression has been—for years at this point; yes, I’ve been an ex-Mormon atheist for that long now and it blows my mind—that the fundamental seed of my apostasy, the moment I first broke from the faith, was when I was about twenty-two and finally began to accept myself as a gay man.

In fact, I’ve found myself defending this position several times, when people have implicitly and explicitly accused me of leaving Mormonism so I could go “sin” and “be gay.” I’ve been forced to say repeatedly that my being okay with being gay, as the first point of doctrine I disagreed with my church on, was a (perhaps the) deciding factor, the first step in my journey away from religion, but wasn’t the REASON I ended up leaving. After all, I pointed out, there are any number of practicing Mormons who are also okay with gays or with being gay and they haven’t felt the need to leave. I left the Mormon church because I disagreed with virtually every point of doctrine, including the existence of deity.

I realized today that I’ve been fundamentally wrong this whole time. Not about Mormonism being full of shit, or about the existence of deity, or about religion being a net negative in today’s world, but about when I felt the first disconnect with religion.

It all comes back to patriarchy. You see, I was a feminist long before I realized I was a gay man. I was a feminist in the making before I started kindergarten. Why? Because when I was a kid I wanted to be a girl. When I was REALLY young I very nearly thought I was a girl. I had no interest in the “boy” things other boys were obsessed with—I wanted a Barbie and a My Little Pony and a Rainbow Brite and pretty dresses and I wanted to be a princess AND a sorceress AND an enchantress and forget that moron He-Man, I wanted to be SHE-RA.

I identified strongly with my mom over my dad, and, especially when I was super-little I had trouble accepting that my (one-year-older) sister and I were not functionally the same person. (I mean, we did everything together, and we always would, right?) So when I found out what the Mormon patriarchy expected of young women, I took it very personally.

My mom had her own visible struggles with patriarchy as well. She told us how her father was a Scoutmaster when she was a tween and she fought long and hard for the right of going on campouts with him and her brothers without success, and I watched her do her best to turn the local Young Women’s camping program into something resembling an actual outdoors exploration course.

It upset me that my mom, who was so smart and capable and (let’s face it) ambitious, especially when compared with my go-with-the-flow dad, was expected to accept a background role and take orders from all the stupid MEN around her just because she was a woman. My mom tried to be philosophical about her lot; denying her natural gifts was God’s way of teaching her to be patient, and a better person, and what-the-fuck-ever-else, but I didn’t, couldn’t buy it.

Polygamy bothered me for a similar reason. Why had men been “given” (yes, that’s right—GIVEN) more than one wife, but women were only allowed to marry one man?

Why were there so few independent females in the scriptures, which were otherwise crowded with independent men? Why were there vanishingly few female prophets?

I’m sad to say I learned fairly quickly that voicing concerns about this got me labeled as weird and girly, and I learned even quicker that these were “bad” things to be. As I got older and became more convinced that I actually was male I found myself participating in the patriarchy, both overtly by becoming a deacon at age twelve just like all the other guys, and by laughing uncomfortably at my friends’ sexist jokes. But I was still never comfortable with the whole thing, just like I was never entirely comfortable being male.

Another thing I’ve often said is that I was a “true believer” back before I started explicitly questioning Mormon doctrine when I was in my early twenties. But I’ve been wrong about that, too. I certainly tried hard enough to be a true believer—doing everything I could think of to convince myself and everyone else that I believed. Hypnotizing myself into suppressing my doubts. Testifying to others with passion, zeal and throbbing sincerity that I not only believed, I knew that the Mormon church was the true church of Jesus Christ on the earth.

But the seed had already been planted. The seed of feminism, of fairness, of this isn’t right, this can’t possibly be right, because it contradicts everything that makes sense. And once I took that next step of acknowledging that I was gay, and accepting myself for who I was, it couldn’t be held back any longer. Because if I was gay, then not fitting into the straight male paradigm was completely irrelevant! I could be as girly or as feminine as I liked. Everything else in my ex-religious journey, I’m convinced, followed from there.

The Mormon church, like almost every other existing religious sect, is fundamentally patriarchal. It is anti-feminist, anti-fairness. Anti-sense. Not just because its doctrines are not true, but in its philosophy, organization, culture and outlook. It pains me to say this, because so many people I love and value are still part of it, and have defended and will continue to defend its destructiveness to me and to others. I just hope that if enough people point out the reality of religion and Mormonism that we can make a difference in the future of girls, women, boys and men everywhere.

9 thoughts on “When I Knew

  1. You need to come to the Episcopal Church with me some time. In the 1970′s the US Church decided that women should no longer be excluded from the leadership (priesthood). Not long after, there were bishops who were women. It is 30 years later and the head of the US Church is a woman. Compare this to another faith that changed who could be in the priesthood in the 1970′s. We even have gay and lesbian bishops who are out and proud.

  2. Thanks, Chandelle.

    Chris, I’d love to visit an Episcopalian service sometime. I think it’s great that women are so well integrated in the church hierarchy. I have other problems with the doctrine and organization, since—as a Christian church—it’s based on the patriarchal Bible, and, as gay-accepting as it is, it hasn’t seemed that the out and proud bishops have been accepted with quite the universal goodwill one would wish for. But sure, I’ll come sometime. I have quite a few friends who are Episcopalian, or at least attend Episcopalian services.

    Not today, though. I’m staying in today. :D

  3. I don’t know you, but found your blog through a friend’s blog. I have recently realized the flaws in Mormonism. I lived it to please my family, but it is just wrong. Forget fairness. The Bible is full of contradictions. The Book of Mormon teaches that man should have one wife…and then they instigated polygamy even though it was illegal. I love how they try to pass the Canopic jars in the Book of Abraham facsimilie off as idolotrous gods. You can look at the text and compare it to other Egyptian funerary documents and it is clear. The facsimilies are a funerary papyri. Joseph Smith purchased them with a mummy!

  4. Welcome to Alone and Unobserved, melinda, and thanks for commenting. I don’t know what your journey has been like, but coming to the realization that the religion I’d practiced my whole life was a complete fabrication—and an illogical one at that—was both enraging and liberating. I was embarrassed that I’d ever accepted transparent lies like the Book of Abraham, and worse, that I’d taught them to others as truth.

    In any case, welcome to the world outside Mormonism! It’s strange out here, but it can be a lot of fun. And best of all, you don’t have to live a lie.

  5. It’s good to hear your journey, Sean. I’ve felt so free since I left Mormonism. It’s so good to be happy and free of guilt. I’m so happy that you don’t have the huge burden that Mormonism lays on your shoulders anymore.

  6. Lol. It’s funny for me to read this, since I went a totally different way. I was raised in Germany in a largely protestant (and in Germany, that means more or less automatically Lutheran) region, and my religious instructors at school where these total LEGO-Christians, just picking and chosing all the “nice” bits and ignoring all the hellfire and brimstone stuff. Their image of God was that of this loving, nice, fair “Being”, genderless, without prejudices. The Jesus they told me about was this fair-minded gentle reformer that was all about social equality.
    And I looked around, looked at the world, and just thought: What the fuck are they talking about? War, disease, strife, ecoclysm, tyranny, prejudices… where is this benign God and his benign prophet? How powerless must they be, if this is the world they left us?
    Of course, when I was 5 years old I didn’t have the words to express this, but for as long as I could remember, it just felt wrong. Not that it wouldn’t be nice to have such a God, but that it simply didn’t match up with the real world. So, I became an atheist pretty much the same same time I stopped believing in Santa Claus.
    I’m still not exactly a theist, but the first time I discovered a view on religion that didn’t seem just plain stupid was when I read Jack Miles’ “God. A Biography”. Miles looks at God as He actually is described in the Old Testament, and finally I got a description that made sense. God was passionate, rash, glaringly unfair, fickle, at times downright psychotic. He, too, was loving, but in a fiery, unpredictable way, and He could forgive just as likely as he could cast you out. He was a lot like real life. Glorious, but painful, unimaginable beautiful, and just as shockingly ugly. He wasn’t necessary “good”, at least not by any human, moral standard, but if He was, we shouldn’t be living in the world we do. But He certainly was intresting, fascinating. He may still not be real, in a literal sense, but He sure seems to be a hell of a great metaphor for the complexities of life.
    And if He is as misogynistic, homophobic, racist, war-mongering, genocidal, and curiously obsessed with what peeps are allowed to wear and to eat as scripture paints Him to be, well, it explains a lot, doesn’t it? ;-)

  7. Pingback: Sunday in Outer Blogness: Scenes from Church and Life Edition! | Main Street Plaza

  8. Yay for feminists!

    I was always a feminist too. I distinctly remember being five years old and asking my mom why women couldn’t have the priesthood, and when she told me it was because we got to be mothers, I thought to myself, “That’s the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard.”

    I did believe in the church, but I believed in other things, like feminism and equality, a lot more.
    Eliza R. Snitch´s last post: First ArticleMy Profile

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

CommentLuv badge